Despite all the proven progress of contemporary medicine, some people are drawn to non-traditional or “natural” cures and approaches. A number of these are not dangerous. As one cancer specialist observed recently, people undergoing cancer treatment will frequently try meditation or vitamins as well. When such a practice is in addition to, and not instead of, evidence-based treatment, this is usually not a problem. If it lessens distress, it can help.
But the proliferation of online health influencers poses problems that authorities and oversight bodies in many countries have not fully understood. A recent inquiry into a particular organization providing membership and advice to expectant mothers has revealed numerous cases of late-term fetal deaths or other serious harm connected to mothers or birth attendants linked with it. While the entity is headquartered in North Carolina, its influence is global.
“Across whole populations, going through labour and birth without professional support is linked to higher levels of risk for mother and baby,” according to a professor of midwifery.
Giving birth without medical assistance, known as free birth, is legal in countries including the UK and US. The risks are not well understood due to a absence of data. Childbirth can be a daunting experience, and high-quality care is not guaranteed. In England, a alarming recent report found two-thirds of maternity units to be unsafe or in need of improvement.
Criticisms of medical systems and specific, persistent issues with maternity care are in many cases valid. Many of the women spoken to for the investigation had previously experienced distressing births.
But while distrust of established systems may be based on experience, it has also proved to be a breeding ground for other influencers looking for converts to their unorthodox methods and DIY ethos. During the pandemic, a “wellness” industry supposedly focused on healthy living was involved in disseminating falsehoods about vaccines and feeding paranoia about government advice.
Worry is rising that such beliefs are acquiring more widespread traction. One presentation given at a cancer conference focused on misinformation, which it said had “acutely worsened in the past decade”. The inquiry shows that behind the image of an rebellious sisterhood lies an enterprise that trains women as social media influencers as well as birth attendants. The group does not present itself to be a qualified medical provider.
There is no turning the clock back to a time when doctors were presumed to know best. Huge quantities of scientific research are made available online and many people use these to beneficial effect. But there is also a need for protections from poor advice. It is well known that the algorithms used by tech companies promote increasingly sensational content.
In the UK, necessary reforms to maternity services are urgently needed. They should include the option of home birth and the availability of clear information to empower women in choosing their care. Ministers and organizations such as the World Health Organization should also create strategies for the online information landscape so that evidence-based healthcare is not compromised.
An avid explorer and travel writer with over a decade of experience in documenting remote destinations and outdoor adventures.